An Open Letter about the Aboriginal Voice

   - from former High Court Judges



An eminent group of retired judges, who form the National Integrity Committee auspiced by the Australia Institute, have penned an open letter to the people of Australia in support of a 'Yes' vote in the upcoming referendum on the Voice.

The moving letter, to be published in newspapers across Australia tomorrow, emphasises how the Voice will deliver on the call made in the Uluru Statement from the Heart and enrich our democracy.

As a letter which we think should be read by all Australians, we send you a copy in full below:

An Open Letter to the Australian Public
The Voice to Parliament would enhance Australian governance

July 31 2023
From the Australia Institute
www.australiainstitute.org.au


We are individuals representing no political party or political interest. We speak, rather, as retired judges who spent our professional lives listening to, and seeking to evaluate, contending arguments.

We have since considered carefully both the case for, and the case against, the proposed Voice to Parliament. Having done so, we confidently believe that, by raising the quality of our public debate, the proposed Voice will both enrich our democracy and increase the likelihood of governments making correct decisions about matters that affect Indigenous peoples. It will also, and very importantly, give Indigenous Australians their due recognition in our Constitution as this nation’s first peoples.

Democracies are at their best when decisions are made after informed and respectful debate to which all may contribute. Life being what it is, the rich and the powerful have and will retain that privilege to a greater degree than most. Some, among them Australia’s First Nations peoples, have continually battled to be heard at all.

If successful, the referendum on the Voice will not diminish the influence of anyone. But it will help to correct an historic wrong. It will give recognition, and a voice, to those who for thousands of years owned and lived in balance with this land, only to have their rights to it disregarded during the centuries which have followed settlement from other lands. No consideration was given to the deep connections with country which the original inhabitants have incorporated into their very being; and the newcomers who now occupy their land listened, if they listened at all, with none of the empathy to which everyone should be entitled.

Constitutional recognition of the Voice in a successful referendum will acknowledge these facts, and do much to rectify a long-existing injustice. It will not, in our opinion, divide our nation. On the contrary, it will heal a wound which presently divides us. Nor will it disrupt government or destabilise the presently stable and appropriate division of power between the parliament, the executive and the judiciary.

The possibility of disruption and instability is a concern which nevertheless deserves respect (although not when it descends to ridiculous fears such as that Anzac Day will be ‘cancelled’). It is also reasonable to have doubts about the detail of the arrangements which will follow a successful referendum. We nevertheless firmly believe that these are not reasons for voting ‘No’. First, Australia can draw upon its wealth of common sense and its capacity for sensible compromise. The Voice will not waste its time, energy, finances or goodwill with silly claims that have no chance of political or judicial support. And secondly, detailed arrangements must allow for a degree of flexibility which is impossible if incorporated into a less than flexible constitution. The details are properly to be determined by the parliament of the day according to the changing circumstances of the day.

Advocates for the ‘No’ case point to the proposed amendment’s inclusion of a power in the parliament to make laws with respect to the powers of the Voice. The referendum if passed does not confer powers on parliament that it does not already have to pass such laws. We believe that the likelihood of parliament acting inappropriately in this respect is small. In our opinion it fails to justify a ‘No’ vote.

Advocates for a ‘No’ vote also claim that the Voice is a creature of Canberra. That is untrue. The call for the Voice was made in the Uluru Statement from the Heart, which is the product of the widest survey of the views of First Nations peoples ever undertaken and which is a deeply respectful call “from all points of the Southern Sky”.

It includes an invitation to all Australians to create a better future. We think this invitation should be accepted.

Signed --
    The Hon Mary Gaudron KC
    Former Judge of the High Court of Australia

    The Hon Carmel McLure AC KC
    Former President of the Supreme Court of Western Australia Court of Appeal

    The Hon Stephen Charles AO KC
    Former Judge of the Supreme Court of Victoria Court of Appeal

    The Hon David Harper AM KC
    Former Judge of the Supreme Court of Victoria Court of Appeal

    The Hon Robert Redlich AM KC
    Former Commissioner of the Victorian Independent Broad-based Anti-Corruption Commission (IBAC), former Judge of the Supreme Court of Victoria Court of Appeal

    The Hon Paul Stein AM KC
    Former Judge of the Supreme Court of NSW Court of Appeal, former President of the Anti-Discrimination Board

    The Hon Anthony Whealy KC
    Former Judge of the Supreme Court of NSW Court of Appeal

    The Hon Margaret White AO
    Former Judge of the Supreme Court of Queensland Court of Appeal


---

Thank-you for reading the open letter supporting the Voice. Please forward this letter to anyone you think would be interested to read it.

Onwards
~ The Australia Institute



For more information click here......

Conversation


Quote - Life is very hard for many of my people. Good and bad things came with the years of contact - and with the years following. - Aboriginal Elder Miriam Rose Ungunmerr
(By A. D. - Marist Laity - from AUSTRALIA - 2023-8-4)

Quote - We hope that the people of Australia will wait. Not so much waiting for us - to catch up - but waiting with us, as we find our pace in this world. - Aboriginal Elder Miriam Rose Ungunmerr
(By A. D. - Marist Laity - from AUSTRALIA - 2023-8-4)

Social Justice - How can we integrate prayer, reflection, and spiritual discernment into our pursuit of social justice, seeking divine guidance and wisdom in our actions?
(By A. D. - Marist Laity - from AUSTRALIA - 2023-8-4)

Add to Conversation

 

Rating for October

0
 
1
Please click to rate 'thumbs up' or 'thumbs down'...

Date
04 August 2023

Tag 1
Act Local

Tag 2
Aboriginal Spirituality

Tag 3
Social Justice

Source Name
Former High and Supreme Court Judges - Audio by Andrew Dumas

Source URL
https://australiainstitute.org.au/...

Activity

Watch the video by clicking play.

Click the RED thumbs up above.

Share this page by clicking the SOCIAL media icon below.

(Print Page)








Page Counter
40 visitors this month.









Marist Laity Australia - Home Page